Jaeger, Pascal wrote: > Thanks for the information Justin. > But I'm a little bit lost right now. > These classes have been in the core quite a long time and are now unstable? > Yes they were... but they were put there prematurely. The instability comes from simply lack of testing really, a bit of over complexity. It was assumed that it was more or less unused. You are actually the first user I have heard using these classes. Apologies for that.
> Can you tell me the equivalent concepts of the classes GeoResource and Service > so I can build my tool on stable classes? Well there are none really. The idea of a catalog is something new in geotools. I am not against the idea, but I think it needs to be thought a bit more, live as an unsupported module for a while until it is deemed stable, has a handful of users. That said, we use unsupported modules all the time, so it is not so bad. Actually we depend on a few for geoserver (shhh... don't tell anyone :)) Hopefully once the classes start to see some major use, we can think about moving them back into the core of library. -Justin > > Cheers > > Pascal > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: Justin Deoliveira [mailto:[email protected]] > Gesendet: Dienstag, 5. Mai 2009 17:10 > An: Jaeger, Pascal > Cc: Geotools-Devel list > Betreff: Re: [geotools-dev] Looking for class files in org.geotools.catalog > > Hi Pascal, > > First off, this is not really the dev list we use, i suggest you post to > the sourceforge list: > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel > > As to answer your question, yes those classes have moved because they > were quite unstable, untested, and really more of an experiment that did > not really belong in the core the library. > > As for getting the unsupported jars, they are not typically released, so > you won't find them in the downloaded release. You can however download > them from one of the maven repositoryies: > > http://download.osgeo.org/webdav/geotools/org/geotools/gt-repository/ > http://repo.opengeo.org/org/geotools/gt-repository/ > > -Justin > > Jaeger, Pascal wrote: >> Hey there, >> >> I have a tool based on geotools 2.3 and now I am trying to implement it >> against 2.6. >> But I have some difficulties with geotools.catalog. >> I found out that ServiceInfo and GeoResourcInfo have moved to >> geotools.data (of which I already have a jar file containing them). >> Now I found in the JavaDoc that classes like AbstractGeoResource, >> GeoResource and Service have been moved into >> the gt-library.jar or the gt-unsupported.jar. But unfortunatelly I can >> find neither of these jars. >> Where can I get them? >> >> I hope you can help. >> >> Regards >> >> Pascal >> >> >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: >> >> http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email >> >> > > -- Justin Deoliveira OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org Enterprise support for open source geospatial. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ The NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanners deliver under ANY circumstances! Your production scanning environment may not be a perfect world - but thanks to Kodak, there's a perfect scanner to get the job done! With the NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanner you'll get full speed at 300 dpi even with all image processing features enabled. http://p.sf.net/sfu/kodak-com _______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
