Jody Garnett ha scritto: >>> Can I ask people to look this over prior to me starting work on it. I >>> want to make sure this code is deprecation free prior hacking of some >>> course materials. >> Jody, I agree on the general sentiment of the proposal. >> I just need a clarification on the 2.6 part, where basically >> the GeoApi methods are pulled down with no net resulting effect? > > You are correct; I am pulling the methods down with no net effect in > order to refine the documentation if needed.
Ah ok, this was not clear in the sample, where the methods were pulled down without any javadoc at all. What about pulling down only the methods that do need extra clarifications? >> If one wants to program using only GeoTools interfaces he can do >> so anyways? All that is needed is a factory that returns GT2 type >> narrowed style objects and everything flows from there on no? > > Correct; there will the the occasional reference to CodeLists defined > at the GeoAPI level (consider ContrastMethod in the above example) but > factory methods are not needed for those. Nice Cheers Andrea -- Andrea Aime OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org Expert service straight from the developers. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Crystal Reports - New Free Runtime and 30 Day Trial Check out the new simplified licensign option that enables unlimited royalty-free distribution of the report engine for externally facing server and web deployment. http://p.sf.net/sfu/businessobjects _______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
