Is this not just a coordinate transformation challenge? That is defining a
new reference system.

I do not think I understand why a new WFS plugin would be required as they
are orthogonal concerns.
--
Jody Garnett


On Tue, 19 Nov 2019 at 12:28, Phil Scadden <p.scad...@gns.cri.nz> wrote:

> Was at FOSS4G Oceania conference and went to very interesting talk on DGGS
> spatial coordinates. I am guessing it will be a long time before this
> becomes mainstream but I was wondering how difficult it would be for WFS
> spatial queries to use a DGGS field in tables which also contained “normal”
> geography field. Doing spatial queries against global databases (ie cant
> use a projected coordinates system) around the poles and antemeridian is
> tough. DGGS fixes the problem. Normal rendering code etc would be
> unaffected. How easy would it be to do a replacement WFS plugin?
> Notice: This email and any attachments are confidential and may not be
> used, published or redistributed without the prior written consent of the
> Institute of Geological and Nuclear Sciences Limited (GNS Science). If
> received in error please destroy and immediately notify GNS Science. Do not
> copy or disclose the contents.
> _______________________________________________
> GeoTools-Devel mailing list
> geotools-de...@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
>
_______________________________________________
Geoserver-users mailing list

Please make sure you read the following two resources before posting to this 
list:
- Earning your support instead of buying it, but Ian Turton: 
http://www.ianturton.com/talks/foss4g.html#/
- The GeoServer user list posting guidelines: 
http://geoserver.org/comm/userlist-guidelines.html

If you want to request a feature or an improvement, also see this: 
https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/wiki/Successfully-requesting-and-integrating-new-features-and-improvements-in-GeoServer


Geoserver-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-users

Reply via email to