Le 24/09/2019 à 12:50, Nuno Oliveira a écrit :
That say, when you get back a 200 and the cache on disk was not deleted, it usually means that one of the provided truncate parameters didn't match the cache (e.g. style, image format, etc ...).
I already got a truncate request that did not delete the cache on disk, even though the parameters were the same as usual (the request is scripted, and it worked before and after the failure).
I could not swear that I had gotten a 200 back but I'm 100% sure that the parameters were correct.
Regards -- Arnaud _______________________________________________ Geoserver-users mailing list Please make sure you read the following two resources before posting to this list: - Earning your support instead of buying it, but Ian Turton: http://www.ianturton.com/talks/foss4g.html#/ - The GeoServer user list posting guidelines: http://geoserver.org/comm/userlist-guidelines.html If you want to request a feature or an improvement, also see this: https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/wiki/Successfully-requesting-and-integrating-new-features-and-improvements-in-GeoServer Geoserver-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-users
