On 2010-02-23, Neil Bothwick <n...@digimed.co.uk> wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Feb 2010 18:33:56 +0000 (UTC), Grant Edwards wrote:
>
>>> No, I read them from a number of machines but using a single
>>> server that handles all the filtering too.
>>
>> Same here -- the only difference between the two approaches is
>> who's administering the server. You handle it yourself, I let
>> gmane do it. :)
>
> The main difference is that mine still works when my Internet
> connection is not available.
I read the mailing lists from many different locations. I don't
keep complete Usenet and mailing-list archives at all machines
and locations. It doesn't really matter to me where the server
is -- if I've no network access, I can't read Usenet or mailing
lists. But, it's just not an issue.
> And that all my mail is accessible from the same place,
> including mails I'd never put on a server owned by someone
> else.
I guess I just have no interest in keeping archives of 50
newsgroups/mailing-lists on a handful of different machines.
Any "servers" I set up would be a lot less reliable and
accessible than those at either Gmane or my Usenet provider.
--
Grant Edwards grante Yow! So this is what it
at feels like to be potato
visi.com salad
