On Fri, 22 Jan 2010 08:37:06 -0500 Mike Edenfield <kut...@kutulu.org> wrote:
> However, this cascade of unstable dependencies is the reason > so many people discourage mixing arch and ~arch. Especially > if you're using an unstable version of something with as > many dependencies as xorg-server, by the time you're done > you'll likely have half of your system unmasked. If you're > willing to run an unstable Xorg anyway, you might want to > consider running fully ~arch. > > --Mike I think autounmask is not exactly mixing ~arch and arch, since it only adds keywords on specified versions and the versions of the dependencies that are needed. It is not adding a general ~arch for packages. Meaning the next updates on those packages are stable again (If you are not changing keywords again of course).
