Am Sun, 01 Nov 2009 09:15:29 -0600 schrieb Harry Putnam <rea...@newsguy.com>:
> walt <w41...@gmail.com> writes:
>
> > On 10/31/2009 07:05 PM, Harry Putnam wrote:
> >> ...
> >> /var/tmp/portage/dev-libs/libxslt-1.1.26/temp/autoconf.out
> >> ***** autoconf *****
> >> ***** PWD: /var/tmp/portage/dev-libs/libxslt-1.1.26/work/libxslt-1.1.26
> >> ***** autoconf
> >>
> >> configure.in:120: error: possibly undefined macro: AC_LIBTOOL_WIN32_DLL
> >> If this token and others are legitimate, please use m4_pattern_allow.
> >> See the Autoconf documentation.
> >> configure.in:121: error: possibly undefined macro: AM_PROG_LIBTOOL
> >
> > If I'm interpreting things correctly (unlikely) those two macros are defined
> > in /usr/share/libtool/libtld/aclocal.m4, which belongs to the libtool
> > package.
> > (On my machine, sys-devel/libtool-2.2.6a).
> >
> > Do you have such a file/package on your machine?
>
> I have libtool installed but not that new of version. In fact portage
> doesn't show that new a version being available for ~x86, as of this
> mornings sync.. (Its masked here)
>
> reader > eix sys-devel/libtool
> [I] sys-devel/libtool
> Available versions:
> (1.3) 1.3.5
> (1.5) 1.5.26 (~)1.5.26-r1 [m]2.2.6a [m]**9999
> {test vanilla}
> Installed versions: 1.5.26-r1(1.5)(14:09:44 10/31/09)
> Homepage: http://www.gnu.org/software/libtool/
> Description: A shared library tool for developers
Wait, but those are small 'm's. That means they must have been masked
manually. As Alan McKinnon mentioned in your other thread ("When masked pkg not
in [...]profiles/package.mask, where is it"), you might have an entry
in /etc/portage/package.mask.
HTH
--
Marc Joliet
--
Lt. Frank Drebin: "It's true what they say: cops and women don't mix. Like
eating a spoonful of Drāno; sure, it'll clean you out, but it'll leave you
hollow inside."
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
