Am 28.10.2009 19:57, schrieb Alan McKinnon: > On Wednesday 28 October 2009 20:44:59 Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: >>> That kind of delivery limits the access to this mails to the local >>> maschine. If I want to read local I don't need mails, I could just read >>> the logfiles from portage in /var/log/ >>> >>> But I am aware that solving this problem is nothing that portage has to >>> do, as it is no problem with portage at all. >>> >>> My mail was just to show that not everyone has a local mailserver >>> running on his maschine. >>> >>> Greetings >>> >>> Sebastian >>> >> >> then let it store everything as elog and read that with elogv. >> >> mail is just an additional bonus feature. >> > > His initial mail said that he would like a copy of elogs to go to his inbox > at > his ISP.
NO.. As I am NOT Grant I don't said that. My Mail was more a reply to Volker Armin Hemmann to show that not everyone has a local mailserver running (what Volker implied) > Later mails imply he might want to read them over IMAP so they are > accessible at multiple locations. Yes, that would be great. > Have you looked at ssmtp? Very light, very small and you can protect your > login password with Unix file permissions instead of leaving them open in > make.conf That sounds great, I absolutly going to look at it. Thanks for the tip, maybe that is something for Grant too. Greetings Sebastian
