On Sun, 20 Sep 2009 20:50:02 +0800, William Kenworthy wrote:

> Lots of other things use them as well - not just X, so thats not a
> reason (and lots of systems that dont have X but need dbus and hal).  I
> would like to know why they are started in the default run-level, not at
> boot which seems more reasonable for low level hardware support.

Because they don't need to go in boot, as evidenced by the successful
booting of your system. The boot runlevel is for those services that have
to be started before anything else.

Dbus doesn't need to be put in any runlevel, it will be started when hald
needs it.


-- 
Neil Bothwick

One person's error is another person's data.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to