On 2009-08-25, Paul Hartman <paul.hartman+gen...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 4:04 PM, Grant Edwards<grant.b.edwa...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>> Were firefox 3.5.2 and xulrunner 1.9.1.2 marked as stable last
>> week and then changed back to unstable this week?
>
> I think so, yes. If you read the Changelog file, it shows this:
>
> 21 Aug 2009; Christian Faulhammer <fa...@gentoo.org>
> mozilla-firefox-3.5.2-r1.ebuild:
> revert all stable keywords
>
> 20 Aug 2009; Jeroen Roovers <j...@gentoo.org>
> mozilla-firefox-3.5.2-r1.ebuild:
> Stable for HPPA (bug #280393).
>
> 20 Aug 2009; Christian Faulhammer <fa...@gentoo.org>
> mozilla-firefox-3.5.2-r1.ebuild:
> stable x86, security bug 280393
I forgot about the ebuild changelog file -- I knew I should
have been able to figure this out somehow. It was the
afternoon/night of the 20th that they got upgraded. Heck, the
packages were probably back to unstable before the all of
builds finished.
For other packages I wouldn't care much, but flipping back and
forth between "semi-major" versions of firefox/xulrunner is
both fairly disruptive and takes hours and hours of build-time.
I guess I'll leave them as-is for a while. Firefox 3.5 is
noticably snappier, and downgrading them will take all evening.
--
Grant Edwards grante Yow! You were s'posed
at to laugh!
visi.com
