Am Samstag 20 Juni 2009 09:37:24 schrieb Mike Kazantsev:

> Dirk Heinrichs <dirk.heinri...@online.de> wrote:
> > > I believe there's "after device-mapper" line already in lvm-2.02.45, so
> > > it should run fine, but as an additional precaution I have dm-crypt
> > > script at sysinit runlevel, which starts device-mapper and dm-crypt
> > > before lvm or even it's runlevel (boot).
> >
> > That's not needed, it should be sufficient to have them all in the boot
> > runlevel:
>
> So LVM would start before dmcrypt? Great.

Yes.

> > > It makes sense for me, since some lvm pv's (not root) are actually on
> > > encrypted partitions, although I mount these even earlier, but should
> > > initrd become incompatible w/ latest kernel, dm-crypt should do the job
> > > instead.
> >
> > No, it does not make sense. You don't even need an initrd.
>
> I do, but mainly for other purposes.

Which?

> Mounting encrypted partitions from there is a bonus and while root is
> not encrypted (although it doesn't even holds most configuration
> from /etc) it is an LVM volume.

> Can linux boot from lvm root w/o initrd these days?

Yes, it always could. As long as /boot is a separate partition one can put the 
same stuff into it. Much simpler to setup.

Bye...

        Dirk

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Reply via email to