* Harry Putnam (rea...@newsguy.com) [12.06.09 16:41]:
> 
> There is a patch offered but still one would think using standard
> emerge on a package that is outside the `~' daredevil stage and is not
> masked, it should `just work' [tm]. 
> 
>

When I read the bug rightfully, procmail did not build with glibc 
2.10.1, which is *not* stable yet, especially because of a lot packages 
which don't build cleanly with it at the moment.

So if you'd use the stable glibc it would build fine. There is no need 
to mark procmail in any way. ~x86 should be able to apply patches on 
their own, or wait until the patch arrives in tree.

Sebastian

-- 
 " Religion ist das Opium des Volkes. "  |   _   ASCII ribbon campaign 
                              Karl Marx  |  ( )   against HTML e-mail  
 s...@sti@N GÜNTHER                       |   X   against M$ attachments
      mailto:sam...@guenther-roetgen.de  |  / \   www.asciiribbon.org  

Attachment: pgpDj4dElppuv.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to