On Wed, 13 May 2009 01:58:18 +0200
Raph <gibbo...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Of course, and so sadly, there is not a penny...
> In order to make a network where any user can access
> his datas whatever the computer he uses, I'm thinking about
> the following kind of configuration :
> - Each client (one of the 20 computers) runs a MBD daemon
> which shares its HD to the server (the 21st) over the
> ethernet.
> - The "server" handle the 3.2TB in a volume group and
> create the logical volumes with LVM
> - The "server" also run a NFS daemon
> - Then each client can grab it's data through NFS.
> - happiness ... ?
> ------
> I never did such a setup but already see a couple of
> problems :
> - each client need some private HD space to, at least,
> boot enough to let the NBD daemon start.
> - $10 question : if 20 users login, will the ethernet
> be fast enough to support the load ?

While I've never had any chance to try distributed fs outside the
sandbox, it looks like a best solution in your case, providing both
speed and data redundancy.

Specifically, I mean AFS (there's a bit outdated guide on gentoo-wiki),
lustre and several other less-known projects like tahoe or pohmelfs.

http://allmydata.org/trac/tahoe
http://tservice.net.ru/~s0mbre/old/?section=projects&item=pohmelfs

-- 
Mike Kazantsev // fraggod.net

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to