On Dienstag 14 April 2009, Alan McKinnon wrote: > On Tuesday 14 April 2009 08:56:51 Roy Wright wrote: > > Alan McKinnon wrote: > > > On Tuesday 14 April 2009 02:19:47 Paul Hartman wrote: > > >> On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 11:28 AM, Paul Hartman > > >> > > >> <paul.hartman+gen...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >>> The only app I am really disappointed with is Amarok 2. > > > > Glad I'm not the only one who doesn't get Amarok 2... > > > > Personally the change over to dolphin is disappointing. So far I've > > been able to mostly ignore it and use konqueror with one major > > exception, fish and sftp no longer work in konqueror. Only sftp works > > in dolphin. In the past (3.x), I always found fish to be bulletproof > > while sftp occasionally would flake.
really? well, it doesn't matter for me. For most quick'n'dirty file browsing dolphin is good enough - and for the serious stuff I have the konqueror-profiles plasmoid. > > I don't like dolphin either, it reminds me too much of Nautilus. But > konqueror is showing it's age, and as a browser it's now almost useless. > It's JavaScript is horribly broken and using flash is just too painful to > contemplate. its javascript is broken? could you show me such a broken page? Because I am using konqueror as main browser every freaking day (without flash). I do have firefox installed, but I use it only and exclusively for youtibe. However, just as a headsup - 4.2.69 is doing nicely. And one thing I love is the stability. Todays prereleases of KDE are more stable then the 2X.0 and 3.X.0 releases.
