On 21/03/09 Nick Fortino said: > It seems like you are reading the message correctly, but you are focusing > on the wrong part. The problem here is gail, not gtk+. What should happen > is gail-1000 is installed as part of this upgrade, and then the block is > resolved. The output of "equery list -p gail" should tell you if gail-1000 > is masked for some reason. Unmasking gail-1000 should resolve the block, > but why it is masked in the first place is rather a mystery.
msoul...@anton:~$ equery list -p gail [ Searching for package 'gail' in all categories among: ] * installed packages [I--] [ ] gnome-base/gail-1.22.3 (0) * Portage tree (/usr/portage) [-P-] [ ] gnome-base/gail-1.20.2 (0) [-P-] [ ] gnome-base/gail-1000 (0) [-P-] [ ] gnome-extra/libgail-gnome-1.20.0 (0) [-P-] [ ] gnome-extra/libgail-gnome-1.20.1 (0) I don't think it's masked. Shouldn't the newer gtk+ flag the fact that it obsoletes the need for gail? Mike -- Michael P. Soulier <msoul...@digitaltorque.ca> "Any intelligent fool can make things bigger and more complex... It takes a touch of genius - and a lot of courage to move in the opposite direction." --Albert Einstein
pgptYcNBZfQN8.pgp
Description: PGP signature
