-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Neil Bothwick wrote: > Mike Kazantsev wrote: > >> And I hate to re-emerge same gcc every time some minor bug (which I >> didn't happen to reproduce) is fixed. > > IKWYM but I think, on balance, this one would have benefited from a bump > as the effects of the breakage were quite widespread. It did make a > difference to the installed files, which is the usual criterion for a > bump.
The reason there wasn't a bump (IIRC) was that the ebuild never changed - - only the eclass did. If you emerged any version of GCC during the window where the eclass was broken, that version of GCC would have been broken. - -- ABCD -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkmJCq4ACgkQOypDUo0oQOqeqwCgrFG9t4t3+ZmTKY5EcjW81Ab/ YIoAmQEQh7FXNlrIj/dCmqSGoIk+g4YG =3Eiv -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
