On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 10:02 PM, Volker Armin Hemmann <volker.armin.hemm...@tu-clausthal.de> wrote: >> Please. He's completely right in demanding apologies and a swift >> reaction to the problem -because if users cannot access the list due to >> undocumented stuff, it's a problem. > > no, he is absolutly wrong in demanding everything. Nobody is paid to be here > or answer his mails. He asked something nobody was able to or willing to > answer. The html mails were a different problem. And now he thinks that his > problem was caused by html - instead it was caused by a lack of > knowledge/willingness in participation. Guys I think you need to take a breather.
I didn't demand an apology. I didn't even demand an answer. Go look at the OP and the replies and take an objective look at the words. Whatever the venomous, naggy, pompous, self-righteous - or even injured - attitude it is you might be projecting just isn't present at all. I just said "hey, look around you guys, here's a problem, and here's some proof that we have it." btw, why is it a problem? If I was just as surprised at the unexpected tones of the responses then, I'm not now. Whatever's been said has been said, and this is the Internet after all. If it explodes so quickly in everyone's face just to see an issue even mentioned - then I'm apologizing on behalf of everyone. As far as I'm concerned, the problem is identified and the obvious solution - some subscription-level FAQ/warning - works and has already been suggested to the bugs people. There's no need for the rest of this.
