On Sat, 29 Nov 2008 09:45:40 +0000 Neil Bothwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> No, and nor should they. Each filesystem implementing its own > encryption layer would be a nightmare. A separate encryption layer on > which you create any filesystem you like is much more sensible. It's true for Linux and any other kernel designed to work with many implementations of "the same" thing (FS in this case). MS doesn't care about many file systems, but just their own, therefore they don't face this problem. -- Best regards, Daniel
