Daniel Pielmeier wrote: > > I will try to explain this a bit from what I know from mailing-lists and IRC. > > First there are no problems with portage-2.2. It has been masked > because some features are not ready and thus are blocking > stabilisation. As a conclusion portage-2.1.6 has been branched out > without this features to get a stable version into the tree which has > support for eapi 2 and all other features that are ready. > > To get more testing to 2.1.6 version it has been decided to mask 2.2 > with the hope more people are using 2.1.6 to get remaining bugs fixed > and to get it stable quickly. Of course some users which are for > instance using kde-4 or other stuff which will need features that are > only in 2.2 will have to unmask portage 2.2 to get the system running. > > This is one thing that annoys me a bit of gentoo. There is way to much > information that is not passed to the users, a short announcement > which explains the situation on the homepage, forum or even the > gentoo-user mailing list and everything would be fine. Some things > important for users are often discussed only on IRC or the gentoo-dev > mailing list so they do not reach most of the users. Examples are this > portage masking and the perl package moves to name a few things that > happened recently. > >
Of course, there is the Gentoo monthly newsletter. Supposed to be monthly anyway. I haven't seen one in a while so it may be going quarterly this time. ;-) I do wish they had or would use a announce mailing list to inform people of changes, big ones anyway, that are coming or in the process of happening. At least that way we would know what is about to get borked or worse and require some huge emerges to get back on track. Anyway . . . . Dale :-) :-)
