Stroller schrieb am 08.11.2008 19:06: > I assume you're aware that if you look inside that directory you'll find > "desktop" and "server" subdirectories?
Yes I am, but what is the problem with that? > $ ls /usr/portage/profiles/default/linux/x86/2008.0/ > desktop developer parent server > $ ls -l /etc/make.profile > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 46 Oct 8 07:01 /etc/make.profile -> > /usr/portage/profiles/default/linux/x86/2008.0 > $ ls /etc/make.profile > desktop developer parent server > $ > > In this case I had assumed the "default" was for Portage simply to > assume desktop. No, if you want the desktop profile you have to specify this explicitly by using /usr/portage/profiles/default/linux/x86/2008.0/desktop for example as symlink. Only relevant are the files in the directory of the chosen profile and not the subdirectories. The "parent" file points to the relevant files that create the profile. cat ${PORTDIR}/profiles/default/linux/x86/2008.0/parent .. ../../../../releases/2008.0 cat ${PORTDIR}/profiles/default/linux/x86/2008.0/desktop/parent .. ../../../../../targets/desktop cat ${PORTDIR}/profiles/default/linux/x86/2008.0/server/parent .. ../../../../../targets/server As you can see profiles go always up in the directory structure and not down. So if you choose 2008.0. Server, developer and desktop profiles are omitted. Regards, Daniel
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature