On Tuesday 16 September 2008 22:47:49 »Q« wrote: > It's not "backwards logic".
"The Paludis developer posts evidence that the liar is lying, therefore I'm going to believe the liar" is entirely backwards.
On Tuesday 16 September 2008 22:47:49 »Q« wrote: > It's not "backwards logic".
"The Paludis developer posts evidence that the liar is lying, therefore I'm going to believe the liar" is entirely backwards.