John covici wrote:
on Tuesday 07/15/2008 Nikos Chantziaras([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote
> Did you try updating glibc even though it's not a dependency with x86?
Nope, because I was hesitant being this is an unstable version --
maybe I should go completely unstable -- I will see what happens.
I don't understand the logic. If you're hesitant to go unstable for one
package, why aren't you less hesitant to go completely unstable?
FWIW, I'm on stable with only a few packages unstable (including gcc and
glibc; the latter only because gcc 4.3 needs it).
--
gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list