On Thursday 24 April 2008, Florian Philipp wrote: > On Thu, 2008-04-24 at 03:40 +0200, Sven Köhler wrote: > > Hi, > > > > is somebody using the package x11-base/x11-drm for intel's integrated > > graphics? > > I'd like to see the output of "dmesg |grep -i drm" to see, of i actually > > have some advanatge of using it. > > > > With the kernel's own 2.6.25, my "dmesg|grep -i drm" says: > > Apr 23 17:43:08 bert kernel: [drm] Initialized drm 1.1.0 20060810 > > Apr 23 17:43:08 bert kernel: [drm] Initialized i915 1.6.0 20060119 on > > minor 0 > > Yep, I'm using it (and the kernel module) and I get the same output of > "dmesg | grep drm" > > If I remember correctly, only =x11-base/x11-drm-20071019 worked for me > (at least there was a reason for me to put it > in /etc/portage/package.keywords)
I also experienced problems getting one to work and settled with this: ================================ $ dmesg |grep -i drm [drm] Initialized drm 1.1.0 20060810 [drm] Initialized radeon 1.26.0 20060524 on minor 0 [drm] Used old pci detect: framebuffer loaded [drm] Setting GART location based on new memory map [drm] writeback test succeeded in 1 usecs ================================ HTH. -- Regards, Mick
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
