Neil Bothwick <neil <at> digimed.co.uk> writes: > > On Sat, 29 Mar 2008 20:39:07 +0000 (UTC), Michael Schmarck wrote: > > > I don't. I disagree with his most important point: It's no good > > to post as much information as possible. Instead, the amount of > > information posted should be "condensed" to only the important > > pieces. > > You have a problem to which you do not know the solution, so how are you > supposed to know what is important and what is not?
As it seems, I knew what was not important. Just have a look at the real root cause of the problem. > Of course, none of this really matters as people will be hesitant to > offer any advice in future, no matter how complete your post, because you > have demonstrated a complete lack of civility and respect for those that > you expect to help you. Oh, that's wrong. Alan very much demonstrated that he did not want to help. Why else would he have posted his snide comment? And if you look carefully, you'll see that I even treated him respectfully, when he tried to be helpful. Care to point out where I showed a "complete lack of civilty"? And care to point out the civilty in what Alan posted in his (maybe unintended) flamebait? Michael -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
