Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon <at> gmail.com> writes: > > On Saturday 29 March 2008, Michael Schmarck wrote: > > > I, too, know what it's like to receive a reply to one of my > > > questions which I find to be unhelpful and aggravating. However, > > > "two wrongs don't make a right" and no-one benefits from an angry > > > response. > > > > Oh, so it's now my fault for responding to a flamebait? Nice. It's > > not the aggressor who's doing something wrong? > > I started this, so I guess I have the right to make the following > request: > > Can we drop this sub-thread now, please? > > Michael, I don't see how you could read my original post as flamebait.
You don't see, how your KDE comment can be seen as a flamebait? Well, too bad. > You were not supposed to respond, You were not supposed to post such a comment in the first place. > I did not intend you to take offence > and it was a harmless joke. If it was indeed supposed to be a joke, then it was a very bad one, especially as it was not visibile as a joke. > You have an answer and a solution that appears to suit you. Not just me. As it turned out, the problem I had was due to a bug in the Gentoo rhythmbox-"2.20" package. It lacked proper dependencies. That is fixed in 2.22. Everything is fine. > That's a > good point to end this at. Yes. Michael -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
