Compile time =) Actually when I ripped off package.unmask, the kde-4 tree just got crazy, so I moved back only autounmask-kde-meta. After that, alsa-driver, which was at -9999 wanted to go back to 1.0.15, that doesn't compile (bug in bugs.gentoo), so I'm now compiling alsa in-kernel, but ir pretty much seems to be working out (thinking about an emerge -C `equery list | grep 9999 | xargs` now)...
Anyway, I believe I got planty of time, it's raining a f***ing lot here and I'm not inclined to be on my way to the University ^^ On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 10:23 AM, Alan McKinnon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Friday 14 March 2008, Gustavo Campos wrote: > > > That's the way I did it before, you know... but it really comes to be > > a pain in the ass when you want to test some new supercool releases > > with tons of dependencies, such as kde-4 and so on. > > Tell me about it, been there done that, I feel your pain :-) > > > > However that's some neat tip, I haven't though on the possibility of > > leaving just package.keywords, I'm giving it a try just right now! > > Thanks a lot! > > It was just an idea that came to me, completely untested. Let us know if > it mostly works out. > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 4:14 AM, Alan McKinnon > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Friday 14 March 2008, Gustavo Campos wrote: > > > > Hi there. > > > > > > > > I have a "stable" system (I don't have ~x86 set), but I like to > > > > have the latest versions of some specific software (kde, gnome, > > > > amarok, alsa, pulseaudio, wine and so on). To achieve that, I've > > > > been using autounmask with the parameter -n. When I have a > > > > package I want to keep in the latest version, I just autounmask > > > > -n package, so all the dependencies are unmasked and no version > > > > number is appended. > > > > > > > > That works fine, but I like to have the latest released > > > > versions, which means I usually want to get away from the *9999 > > > > ebuilds. The trouble is, when I use autounmask without version > > > > numbers, those 9999 packages usually are choosen by portage, for > > > > being the effective latest ones. > > > > > > > > I would like to know if there is a way for me to unmask > > > > (automatically if possible) all versions BUT the 9999 ones, so I > > > > have the latest releases but the less CVS/Beta packages as > > > > possible. > > > > > > I find autounmask does way too much for me, and does it blindly > > > just like a dumb computer should. so I do it manually. However, you > > > are using -n and at the same time trying to use it without -n... > > > > > > Trying deleting the autounmask files in > > > /etc/portage/package.unmask/, that should go a long way to removing > > > the CVS stuff (which is usually hard masked) leaving just > > > package.keywords. You might have to manually resolve some conflicts > > > now and then though - small price > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Alan McKinnon > > > alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com > > > > > > -- > > > gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list > > > > -- > > Gustavo Campos > > > > Ciência da Computação / Computer Science - UFMG > > > > -- > > > Alan McKinnon > alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com > > -- > gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list > > -- Gustavo Campos Ciência da Computação / Computer Science - UFMG -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
