On Sunday 19 August 2007, Bo Ørsted Andresen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote about 'Re: [gentoo-user] no standalone jre?': > On Sunday 19 August 2007 16:57:17 Ralf Stephan wrote: > > when installing jre, a full jdk is downloaded (57M). > > > > Is this a bug? > > I don't really recall the reason for virtual/jdk to be the default > provider of virtual/jre but you can find it somewhere on bugs.gentoo.org > if you care... ;)
It's probably the fact that Gentoo is source-based, so java packages normally require a jdk (for javac) anyway. That said java in the browser only requires a jre, even on Gentoo. -- Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. ,= ,-_-. =. [EMAIL PROTECTED] ((_/)o o(\_)) ICQ: 514984 YM/AIM: DaTwinkDaddy `-'(. .)`-' http://iguanasuicide.org/ \_/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
