On Monday 13 August 2007 22:54:59 Mark Knecht wrote: > > > > > > Maybe because of this: > > > > > > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=125728#c29 [SNIP] > > Or you could read the link to bugs.gentoo.org in the top of this mail. Or > > post the output from the stable version of revdep-rebuild --ignore. > > I did read it. It seemed that the stable revdep-rebuild solution was > to start editing system files. I didn't want to do that as I don't > know what they do. (Please remember, I am a DUMMY. I am NOT a computer > scientist, a sys admin or a programmer. I used to design chips and now > play music and trade stocks and options. I don't use ~x86 except when > I have a reason. I suspect I'll just go back to stable and join the > hordes looking for a fix to the stable version of revdep-rebuild.)
No no no. It's gcc with the gcj use flag that's broken. The stable version of revdep-rebuild is just showing you already existing breakage in gcc (or inconsistency if you will). Editing those .la files or creating those symlinks are proper solutions. Another solution if you don't need gcj anyway is to disable that use flag.. -- Bo Andresen
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
