On Dienstag, 5. Juni 2007, Denis wrote: > > Amarok is feature-rich, but heavy indeed. I don't recommend it for a > > drop-in XMMS replacement. If you like the idea of editing mp3 tags and > > organzing your music really nicely, browsing it 3 different ways and > > seeing cover art from amazon.com and such, amarok is for you. > > Ha... yea, my use flags have "-gnome" and "-kde" in them, and I run a > very simple fluxbox environment... I just want the music player to > have a decent graphical interface, but just the essential features, > without bloat. > > It seems like I got the Audacious to work... But I still miss the XMMS ;-)
alsaplayer? it is small, fast, you can run douzends of instances at the same time. Play forwards, backwards, at a lot of different speeds - and it has even a playlist. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
