On Tuesday 08 May 2007, Arnau Bria wrote: > Ok, but, what is the content of net_dev.patch?
It's right there in your original mail: diff -Naur /root/tmp-old/Makefile /root/tmp-new/Makefile --- /root/tmp-old/Makefile 2007-01-28 06:41:03.000000000 +0000 +++ /root/tmp-new/Makefile 2007-01-28 06:39:54.000000000 +0000 @@ -55,7 +55,7 @@ EXTRA_CFLAGS += -O2 -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -pipe #EXTRA_CFLAGS += -Wa,-a,-ad -g -EXTRA_CFLAGS += -DZDCONF_WE_STAT_SUPPORT=1 +EXTRA_CFLAGS += -DZDCONF_WE_STAT_SUPPORT=0 EXTRA_CFLAGS += -DHOST_IF_USB EXTRA_CFLAGS += -DAMAC EXTRA_CFLAGS += -DGCCK That IS what the patch file looks like. It will alter your Makefile, and the epatch function in portage is smart enough to try apply the patch to the following files in order: /root/tmp-new/Makefile tmp-new/Makefile Makefile If that doesn't work, the patch itself is faulty for more info "man patch" alan -- Optimists say the glass is half full, Pessimists say the glass is half empty, Developers say wtf is the glass twice as big as it needs to be? Alan McKinnon alan at linuxholdings dot co dot za +27 82, double three seven, one nine three five -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
