On Saturday 02 December 2006 19:22, Richard Fish wrote: > On 12/2/06, Helmut Jarausch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The next step which I'm afraid of is upgrading > > to glibc-2.5 > > > > Having destroyed (the system) of my machine some years > > ago by upgrading glibc (on Suse), I know that this > > is not a trivial step. > > Actually the glibc-2.4 to 2.5 upgrade is pretty trivial, *if* you > already have nptl/nptlonly USE flags set. If you are using a i386 > CHOST (vs i686 or x86_64), then you end up having to change CHOST > before you can upgrade since glibc-2.5 is nptlonly, and that is not > trivial unfortunately. See the current thread on this list. > > > So, the question: > > > > Is there a general source of information about > > warnings, actions to be taking, etc to be followed > > when upgrading certains critical packages. > > Generally speaking, if you set in make.conf: > > PORTAGE_ELOG_CLASSES="warn error log" > PORTAGE_ELOG_SYSTEM="save" > > then any ebuilds that want to warn you or give you actions to take > will create files in /var/log/portage/elog/ for you to read. You can > just delete these once you've taken whatever action is required. > > More complicated upgrades (like the switch to modular-X, or gcc > upgrades) usually have some kind of guide created before they reach > stable. But at this point, there isn't any single-page reference for > these guides...probably something we should have.
Also, the GWN gives a heads up on substantial system component upgrades and links to upgrade guides, which is fine as long as you are not running ~ARCH and bleeding edge version packages. -- Regards, Mick
pgpV8QVJeoRCs.pgp
Description: PGP signature