On Tuesday 12 September 2006 15:34, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > > Anyone seen this before? Am I being stupid (again) or is it
> > > a bug? And if so, where might the bug be - perl, wireshark,
> > > or the portage scripts?
> >
> > It's a bug in the wireshark ebuild. It hasn't been noticed
> > until now because it was silently ignored until yesterday.
> > For details look at [1]. This has been reported in [2].
> > Please use bugzilla to search before asking these
> > questions...
>
> Except that this behaviour I see is neither of the cases you
> mention. They relate to the bahaviour when the minimal flag is
> set. I'm getting the error when the flag is NOT set. There is
> no reason why this line should return true on my system:

Please read more carefully. Whether it is set or not is irrelevant. The 
problem is that your version doesn't have minimal use flag at all yet the 
wireshark tests whether it's set...

-- 
Bo Andresen

Attachment: pgpqsQEKdjmqz.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to