> Ok, maybe stupid questions time. > > /dev/hdj1 does exist, right?
yes > Is this the same drive that was once part of the array? It is existing. But possible it may have legitamatly failed. Here is a log generated today when I tried to add it back into the array. Sep 2 09:11:02 [kernel] end_request: I/O error, dev hdj, sector 586099263 Sep 2 09:11:02 [kernel] Buffer I/O error on device hdj1, logical block 146524800 ... Sep 2 09:11:02 [kernel] lost page write due to I/O error on hdj1 Sep 2 09:11:02 [kernel] end_request: I/O error, dev hdj, sector 586099263 Sep 2 09:11:02 [kernel] md: disabled device hdj1, could not read superblock. Sep 2 09:11:02 [kernel] md: hdj1 has invalid sb, not importing! Sep 2 09:11:02 [kernel] md: md_import_device returned -22 > If the same drive, does it work if you do "mdadm --zero-superblock > /dev/hdj1" first? ~ # mdadm --zero-superblock /dev/hdj1 mdadm: Unrecognised md component device - /dev/hdj1 > What does "mdadm --examine /dev/hdj1" report? How about for /dev/hdg1? ~ # mdadm --zero-superblock /dev/hdj1 mdadm: Unrecognised md component device - /dev/hdj1 ~ # mdadm --examine /dev/hdj1 mdadm: No md superblock detected on /dev/hdj1. db_server01 ~ # mdadm --examine /dev/hdg1 /dev/hdg1: Magic : a92b4efc Version : 00.90.03 UUID : d77079f9:c084dedf:ba141e09:96726a79 Creation Time : Tue May 30 19:48:40 2006 Raid Level : raid1 Device Size : 293049600 (279.47 GiB 300.08 GB) Array Size : 293049600 (279.47 GiB 300.08 GB) Raid Devices : 2 Total Devices : 1 Preferred Minor : 4 Update Time : Fri Sep 1 20:52:33 2006 State : clean Active Devices : 1 Working Devices : 1 Failed Devices : 0 Spare Devices : 0 Checksum : 2cbf93d9 - correct Events : 0.1402072 Number Major Minor RaidDevice State this 1 34 1 1 active sync /dev/hdg1 0 0 0 0 0 removed 1 1 34 1 1 active sync /dev/hdg1 Does all of this suggest a complete and total drive failure? :-) I orginally built this md4 array as a Raid 5 from three of the cheepest drives that I could find (Maxtors). Then a couple of months later, one drive died. So I converted the remaining to into a raid 1. Now this one seems to have died. I guess I am learning my leason about buying cheep hardware. Fortunately I have a back-up of everything on this array. Regards, Richard Broersma Jr. -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list