You are correct, sir. Read times move at a nice clip - but untar/writes seem to get cut almost in half. Just an observation - as I do not have any solid data analysis atm - just a matter of scratching my skull whilst I listen to what seems to be some serious HD churning.
-Jeff Richard Fish wrote: > On 8/29/06, Jeff Grant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> These are two articles that indeed led me to believe that XFS was the >> way to go - and here, I'm also experiencing some dreadful performance - >> tar/untar performance specifically. > > Can you define "dreadful"? Are you seeing the same results (fast > reads but slow writes) as Ow? > > -Richard
begin:vcard fn:Jeff Grant n:Grant;Jeff org:VoiceSignal;Information Technology adr:;;150 Presidential Way;Woburn;MA;01801;USA email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED] title:Linux System Administrator tel;work:(781)970-5209 tel;fax:(781)970-5200 tel;cell:(978)407-9512 x-mozilla-html:FALSE url:http://www.voicesignal.com/ version:2.1 end:vcard
