On Sunday 07 May 2006 23:21, Tero Grundström wrote: > On Sun, 7 May 2006, Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote: > > On Sunday 07 May 2006 19:20, Tero Grundström wrote: > >> Anyways, 1000Hz is still the preferred setting for desktop (according to > >> menuconfig and CK). That is of course only if you don't have problems. > > > > yeah, but 250 is not worse in 'responsiveness' - and for some people > > 1000Hz reduces performance. > > Well, I don't know about that. I haven't tried 250Hz for a long time. > Maybe I should so I'd see what it does on my system. > > No offense, but I prefer believing the information from the developers :) > > > I went 250Hz a long time ago, and it did not hurt me in any way. But I am > > also only using vanilla kernels without patches ;) > > Whether its patched or vanilla should make no difference in this case.
using a different scheduler like in the ck-patches could make a difference. -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
