-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Iain Buchanan schrieb: > On Mon, 2006-05-01 at 13:21 +0200, Jannis Achstetter wrote: >> You can check your config with "glxinfo | grep direct" which should >> return "Yes". > > $ glxinfo | grep direct > direct rendering: No > OpenGL renderer string: Mesa GLX Indirect Ok, now we know why ... > >> If it doesn't, check your /var/log/Xorg.0.log (assuming >> we are talking about display "0". > > I see a: > (II) LoadModule: "dri" > (II) Loading /usr/lib/xorg/modules/extensions/libdri.so > (II) Module dri: vendor="X.Org Foundation" > compiled for 7.0.0, module version = 1.0.0 > ABI class: X.Org Server Extension, version 0.2 Fine, Xorg can load his DRI-module > > and > > (WW) RADEON(0): Enabling DRM support > > *** Direct rendering support is highly experimental for Radeon 9500 > *** and newer cards. The 3d mesa driver is not provided in this tree. > *** A very experimental (and incomplete) version is available from Mesa CVS. > *** Additional information can be found on http://r300.sourceforge.net > *** This message has been last modified on 2005-08-07. > > > Don't tell me my 9600 isn't supported by the radeon driver?... > also, there's this interesting section that I'm having trouble understanding: > (WW) RADEON(0): Enabling DRM support > > *** Direct rendering support is highly experimental for Radeon 9500 > *** and newer cards. The 3d mesa driver is not provided in this tree. > *** A very experimental (and incomplete) version is available from Mesa CVS. > *** Additional information can be found on http://r300.sourceforge.net > *** This message has been last modified on 2005-08-07. > > drmOpenDevice: node name is /dev/dri/card0 > drmOpenDevice: open result is 6, (OK) > drmOpenDevice: node name is /dev/dri/card0 > drmOpenDevice: open result is 6, (OK) > drmOpenByBusid: Searching for BusID pci:0000:01:00.0 > drmOpenDevice: node name is /dev/dri/card0 > drmOpenDevice: open result is 6, (OK) > drmOpenByBusid: drmOpenMinor returns 6 > drmOpenByBusid: drmGetBusid reports pci:0000:01:00.0 > (II) RADEON(0): [drm] DRM interface version 1.2 > (II) RADEON(0): [drm] created "radeon" driver at busid "pci:0000:01:00.0" > (II) RADEON(0): [drm] added 8192 byte SAREA at 0xe13b2000 > (II) RADEON(0): [drm] mapped SAREA 0xe13b2000 to 0xb7f07000 > (II) RADEON(0): [drm] framebuffer handle = 0xf0000000 > (II) RADEON(0): [drm] added 1 reserved context for kernel > (WW) RADEON(0): [agp] AGP not available > (EE) RADEON(0): [agp] AGP failed to initialize. Disabling the DRI. > (II) RADEON(0): [agp] You may want to make sure the agpgart kernel module > is loaded before the radeon kernel module. > (II) RADEON(0): [drm] removed 1 reserved context for kernel > (II) RADEON(0): [drm] unmapping 8192 bytes of SAREA 0xe13b2000 at 0xb7f07000 > > but agpgart and radeon are both "compiled in" to the kernel. > > I heard something about the RV350 or RV300 (not sure) chipset not being > supported - is this true? > > thanks, Since the very recent release of Xorg they added 3D-support for your card but it is "highly experimental". It seems that it didn't work 100% with your box. I'm sorry I can't really help you with your problem now, you might find something interesting here: http://www.ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=110008 Jannis Achstetter -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFEVh8ssnofy59UleQRAnKpAJ9eXsXq2v35hDwH0dlegtW8I2Pu1gCePizx x0QfOClRjlCpbrsVL4s9VKk= =MUC4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
