Richard Fish wrote:
On 4/26/06, Alexander Skwar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Richard Fish wrote:
> Outlook makes it damn near impossible to properly quote and
> trim a message when replying.
Actually, it does *NOT* - at least not, when you're composing
text/plain mails, as you should.
Which version of outlook are you using?
OL2003
I don't want to go completely off-topic and turn this thread into a
outlook discussion, but I would like to understand why you and I have
such different opinions of outlook.
It's because of the version. In Outlook 2003, they now, in textmails,
properly prefix a quoted line with "> " (if so configured). And
they also allow to easily (ie. without restarting OL) switch between
textmails and HTML or Richtext - when you compose a mail, you can
select if you wish to use the plaintext editor, an HTML editor
or Word.
The only bad thing still is, that it adds a huge "preamble", like
this:
> -----Original Message-----
> From: HP Forums [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, April 27, 2006 3:27 AM
> To: undisclosed-recipients
> Subject: New HP Forum Discussions for Wed Apr 26 17:29:55 EDT 2006
It just sucks, that they still have bad defaults - ie.
Rich Text and Word as Editor etc.pp.
Alexander Skwar
--
Serenity through viciousness.
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
