Daniel da Veiga wrote: > what I didn't notice was an alias for sudo as sudo su -c...
Why are you doing that? What's the purpose of using su instead of sh here? Or put differently: Why use su to run sh when you could run sh directly? Could somebody please explain? Alexander Skwar -- Yeah, but they are good at making toys. I mean look at Windows... -- From a Slashdot.org post about Microsoft's X-Box console -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list