On 3/22/06, Antoine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 22/03/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > So, masked packages only require that package.keyword be edited, but > > hardmasked packages also require that package.unmask be edited? > > > > I see the sense in having different grades of unmasking, but not the need > > for two distinct files(?). > > > > One file with syntax or two files without... > Cheers > Antoine > > -- > This is where I should put some witty comment. > > -- > gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list ..
Ah, thanks, guys. I think that portage is approximately equal to yum in the PITA dept. With yum I was always having to hunt down new repositories, and periodically it'd fail for dependancy reasons. Portage is much easier to use, until something which is "needed" has to unmasked. Interesting, though :) -Thufir -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
