On 3/21/06, Allan Spagnol Comar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, I don't know where should I post this kind of message, but I need > to use lilypond as one of my working tools. I got stunned when I saw > today that lilypond version available at portage tree is 2.0.3 .... > the latest stable version is 2.6.5 and 2.0.3 is extreme old.
There's nothing stopping you from building from source, but Lilypond 2.5.2 is there, just not marked stable: lilypond-2.5.2 ~x86 > Is there a reason that lilypond version is not up to date .... and > should I build myself ( without portage ) if I want to used it ? Something along the lines of this will enable you to emerge it... echo 'media-sound/lilypond ~x86' >> /etc/portage/package.keywords As to why it is masked, I don't know. 'man portage' has a lot of useful info, you should check it out Dave On 3/21/06, Allan Spagnol Comar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, I don't know where should I post this kind of message, but I need > to use lilypond as one of my working tools. I got stunned when I saw > today that lilypond version available at portage tree is 2.0.3 .... > the latest stable version is 2.6.5 and 2.0.3 is extreme old. > > Is there a reason that lilypond version is not up to date .... and > should I build myself ( without portage ) if I want to used it ? > > -- > An application asked: > "Requeires Windows 9x, NT4 or better", > so I´ve installed Linux > > -- > gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list > > -- -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- Version: 3.12 GAT d-(+) s+: a24 C++ UBL++ P+>+++ L++ E--- W+++$ N+ o? K? w O? M-- V? !PS !PE Y PGP- t++ 5++ X+ R+++ tv+ b++ DI++++ D++ G e+ h-- r++ y+ ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------ -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
