On Monday 27 February 2006 20:06, Harry Putnam wrote: > /etc/conf.d/net currently looks like this: > > config_eth0=( "192.168.0.4 netmask 255.255.255.0" ) > > routes_eth0=( > "default via 192.168.0.20" > ) > config_eth1=( "192.168.1.2 netmask 255.255.255.0" ) With both interfaces up what is the output of "ip route"? I don't see anything wrong with the configuration really, both networks are in different subnets so they should be seperate. However you may be getting a default route for eth1. You really don't need one, from the description you give you don't need a route at all for eth1. If all the computers on the 192.168.0.0/24 network can all see each other's MAC addresses then there is no problem.
> I wondering if that is the reason for my troubles. maybe I need to > add a static route for config_eth1? This should not be required for your setup as I understand it. I'd be realy interested in your arp table too, arp -a. -- Zac Slade [EMAIL PROTECTED] ICQ:1415282 YM:krakrjak AIM:ttyp99 -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
