On Friday 20 January 2006 19:59, Holly Bostick wrote:
> more comfortable with a more Windows-like environment, and Windows-like
> assumptions about what a user wants/needs from their desktop, KDE may be
> just the thing; that is, after all, what it's designed to do to a great
> extent.
That statement is extremely unfair to KDE. Every DE needs to make at least 
some assumptions to present a working environment for the user and KDE is not 
alone in doing that. The quality comes in when the DE not only makes some 
choices for you but also gives you an easy access to editing/changing those 
features. As far as I can see, you can edit every choice that KDE has made 
for you with minimal fuss. If that is being Windows-like, then you can not be 
more wrong.

-- 
Regards,
Abhay

Attachment: pgpFYCVgHW1m1.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to