On Fri, 2005-12-09 at 15:55 -0600, Harry Putnam wrote: > I'll probably need the asbestos drawers here shortly: > > I've burned up several hours here with a grindingly slow compile of > kde. It is an older machine ( a few years) but is a P4 2Ghz and 500MB > ram. Is there an alternative to this? I mean aside from using a > lighter, faster compiling, X setup.
> Is there some burning important reason why we need to throw away hours > and hours compiling kde? Wouldn't a binary distribution of kde serve > as well in most ways? Okay, selfplugging a bit here, but thats ok, I've got a permit. Or wait, no I don't, so it seems that this is still unofficial and unsupported by others than me and then only at "best effort": http://chinstrap.alternating.net/ -- begin .signature Tortured users / Laughing in pain See Microsoft KB Article Q265230 for more information. end
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
