On Tuesday 22 Nov 2005 4:23 am, Holly Bostick wrote: > Just because you have a lot of packages installed that have the "pam" USE > flag doesn't mean that much-- is the flag actually enabled for those > packages? > > If so, and your system is not having any issues, I wouldn't necessarily > become hysterical just yet. > I did a emerge -pv for all those packages and looks like all of them are actually using PAM. What I am thinking now is to mask any accidental update of PAM in package.mask and hope that it doesn't get messed up "just_like_that".
Thanks for the help. Abhay
pgp5aLM3bYUFH.pgp
Description: PGP signature
