Ok but i don't think that it could be so low, there must be a point that i'm missing because i tested with some live distros. You can understand it from movement behaviour of window for such low values and when i compare it there is realy a differance. I'll keep on searching the nvidia forum and google for any hope. If i could make it i'll post my solution here. Thank you all for your help.

On 11/14/05, Hemmann, Volker Armin <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:
On Monday 14 November 2005 00:58, sempsteen wrote:
> Hi, at last i got it work but i'm not pleased because i couldn't see any
> performance increment. To solve the problem i simple added this line in
> device section:
> Option "NvAGP" "1"
> which tells X to use NVIDIA internal AGP. (Note that i tried all values for
> NvAGP. 2 and 3 didn't function, black screen again, 0 and 1 functioned).
> With that i could see the Nvidia splash image at gdm startup. Also i tested
> my card again with "glxinfo | grep direct" and "glxgears", worked with no
> errors:
>
> glxinfo | grep direct
> direct rendering: Yes
>
> As i told i'm not pleased, here is my glxgears outputs:
> 1- Just after a gnome session, no additional program is running:
> 860 frames in 5.0 seconds = 172.000 FPS
> 973 frames in 5.0 seconds = 194.600 FPS
> 1003 frames in 5.0 seconds = 200.600 FPS
> 1004 frames in 5.0 seconds = 200.800 FPS
> 1004 frames in 5.0 seconds = 200.800 FPS
> 1003 frames in 5.0 seconds = 200.600 FPS
> 1004 frames in 5.0 seconds = 200.800 FPS
> 1004 frames in 5.0 seconds = 200.800 FPS
> 1004 frames in 5.0 seconds = 200.800 FPS
> 1004 frames in 5.0 seconds = 200.800 FPS
> 1003 frames in 5.0 seconds = 200.600 FPS
>

you are using a tnt2 vanta, right?
a low end tnt2 - so your glxgears output is not surprisingly low...
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list


Reply via email to