On 2/16/25 7:25 PM, Grant Edwards wrote: > The question I'm asking is: > > * Should the libreoffice-bin ebuild list qtx11extras as a dependency? > > If yes, then I'll file a bug report. > > My question is based on the following fact: > > * libreoffice-bin links in the qtx11extras library, but does not have > it as a dependency.
I asked Sam about this. He said that since libreoffice-bin was updated in 24.8.4 and 25.2.0 (both currently limited to testing keywords, i.e. ~amd64 only) to use the upstream libreoffice.org binaries, they don't include the Qt5 or Qt6 plugins at all, and at this point he isn't really interested in messing with the "old" version that is currently stable. So as soon as an updated libreoffice-bin is stabilized your problem should disappear. It does conceptually need "fixing", yes, it's just that since the entire package has been redesigned to use upstream binaries it is no longer considered worth investing time and effort into the old ebuild. The new ebuild will be stabilized hopefully within the month anyway so I would just wait for that and ignore qtx11extras for now. -- Eli Schwartz
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
