Hello, Dale

On Sun, Aug 25, 2024 at 13:28:14 -0500, Dale wrote:
> Alan Mackenzie wrote:

> > Somehow I don't think that will work (which doesn't mean I won't try it).
> > There is something in the motherboard which is throwing off the desired
> > resolution by those extra 192 horizontal pixels, even in the BIOS.

> Do you have x11-apps/xrandr installed?  If you do, see what this says. 

I didn't, but I do now.  After trying (and failing) to run it on the
console, I tried in X-Windows (the display of which is miserably
unstable at the moment).

> xrandr --listmonitors


> This is mine:


> root@Gentoo-1 / # xrandr --listmonitors
> Monitors: 3
>  0: +*DP-2 1920/698x1080/393+0+1080  DP-2
>  1: +DP-1 1920/698x1080/393+0+0  DP-1
>  2: +DP-7 1920/1150x1080/650+1920+1080  DP-7
> root@Gentoo-1 / #

That's one tremendous monitor you've got on DP-7.  :-)

I've got just the one monitor.  I got back:

0: +*HDMI-A-0 1920/521x1080/293+0+0  HDMI-A-0

> DP-2 is my primary display and if you have only one monitor, should be
> the only line for you but might be DP-1 instead.  Micheal might can
> explain this better, or even more correctly, but I think the important
> part for this is where mine says +0+.  I think, just think, if yours
> says something like +192+ instead of 0, that might be a clue.  If it
> says 0 as it should, then this may be the wrong track to look down. 
> What I'm wondering, is the monitor set to show a blank, or black,
> section on that side for some reason.  This could very well not be the
> case tho.  If it shows correctly like mine does, then ignore this and
> know that isn't causing the problem at least. 

No, I've got the +0+, too.

> This is a odd problem.  I don't think I ever saw this even during the
> old CRT days.  o_O

I'm convinced this isn't a problem in Linux.  It's something having got
wedged in the motherboard's firmware, seeing as how the blank strip
appears even when going into the BIOS.  I suspect I'm going to have to
reinitialise the CMOS ram, which I really don't want to do, though
Michael doesn't think that's the problem.  We'll see.

> Dale

> :-)  :-) 

-- 
Alan Mackenzie (Nuremberg, Germany).

Reply via email to