On Sun, 16 May 2021 13:14:26 +0200
n952162 <n952...@web.de> wrote:

> On 5/16/21 12:53 PM, Andreas Fink wrote:
> > On Sun, 16 May 2021 12:49:26 +0200
> > n952162 <n952...@web.de> wrote:
> >  
> >> On 5/16/21 11:28 AM, Neil Bothwick wrote:  
> >>> On Sun, 16 May 2021 11:26:37 +0200, n952162 wrote:
> >>>  
> >>>>>> There are no use flags defined for any of the packages I did a random
> >>>>>> check for, either on the server or the client.  I am worried that it
> >>>>>> is as you say: that the ebuild has a change of USE flags, which, of
> >>>>>> course, has nothing to do with me, the user.  
> >>>>> As already stated, any USE flag changes would appear in the emerge
> >>>>> output, this is most likely caused by --changed-deps. Try with
> >>>>> --changed-use but without --changed-deps to see.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>  
> >>>> I have introduced that into my build script.  But, if it's as you say,
> >>>> the one is a subset of the other, it should have no effect on the
> >>>> output, right?
> >>>>  
> >>> --changed-use is a subset of --newuse. --changed-deps is separate.
> >>>
> >>>  
> >> Ah, I oversaw that.
> >>
> >> Ah. why would I want to have --changed-deps anyway?  That suddenly seems
> >> silly.
> >>
> >> It's unfortunate, if there's no explanatory display if a package got
> >> disqualified for that reason.
> >>
> >>  
> 
> Trying to comprehend here...
> 
> > If you want to have a binhost, then --changed-deps will become
> > "necessary" at some point. Let me draw you a picture, where a binhost
> > would fail to provide the correct package:
> >   - Binhost builds on day 1 package XYZ(i.e. server updates from internet)
> >   - computer that would merge with packages from binhost is NOT 
> > updated(client does NO emerge on that day)
> >   - the dependencies are changed on day 2(i.e. XYZ is emerged onto server, 
> > with changed dependencies in the ebuild)
> >   - Binhost does NOT rebuild, because you do not have --changed-deps
> >     enabled on day 2*(what is "Binhost" here? The --changed-deps is 
> > specified on the client)*
> >   - Computer that merges from the binhost is updated on day 2 but will
> >     NOT use the binary package from binhost, because the dependencies do
> >     not match
> > There are flags to ignore dependency mismatches, but the default would
> > just not use the binary package.
> >
> > Cheers
> > Andreas
> >  
> What does changed-deps mean, actually?
> 
>         --changed-deps [ y | n ]
>                Tells  emerge  to  replace  installed  packages for which
> the corresponding
>                ebuild dependencies have changed since the packages were
> built. ...
> 
> I presume it means that a package needed XYZ before, but now needs
> XYZZ.  If I don't specify --changed-deps, that I might get a run-time
> resolution problem.
Changed dependencies means any change in the *.ebuild file with respect
to the variables DEPEND/BDEPEND/RDEPEND/PDEPEND, e.g. version of a
dependent package has changed, new package was added as dependency, a
package was removed as dependency. All are dependency changes. If the
changed *.ebuild file is commited to the portage tree WITHOUT a
version-bump/revision-bump, then emerge would NOT rebuild the package,
unless --changed-deps is given as an argument.

> 
> Or, does it mean that the package specified XYZ.1 in an excess of
> precision and the new version specifies XYZ.3?
> 
> I just ran into this:
> 
> --binpkg-changed-deps [ y | n ]
>                Tells  emerge  to  ignore binary packages for which the
> corresponding ebuild
>                dependencies have changed since the packages were built. 
> In order  to  help
>                avoid  issues with resolving inconsistent dependencies,
> this option is auto-
>                matically enabled unless the --usepkgonly option is
> enabled.  Behavior  with
>                respect to changed build-time dependencies is controlled
> by the --with-bdeps
>                option.
> 
> But I haven't figured out what it means yet.  In particular, what all
> the stated implications mean.
> 
This would be the option to ignore dependency mismatches of what the
binary package claims its dependencies are (which you could see  in
$PKGDIR/Packages), and what the resolved dependencies are according to
the *.ebuild file as portage is seeing it right now.

Cheers
Andreas

Reply via email to