пт, 14 авг. 2020 г. в 23:03, Grant Edwards <grant.b.edwa...@gmail.com>:
> [For posterity's sake, with -A Output it's -o <interface> rather than > -i <interface>] Ah, you are right! I am sorry, my iptables rule with 'noinet' doesn't include an interface, I added it when typing the message and looked at my rules with an interface from the INPUT section. > My original post also said I was trying to hide an > interface, when all I really needed was to prevent sending of packets > on that interface. Yes, it seems to be enough. I found out that 'noinet' rule when I got annoyed by an application (written by Windows programmers as well) that was continuously checking updates at each launch... No inet - no check :) > I think this should work, but I need to rebuild my kernel with the > iptables "owner" extension enabled: Clear! -- Best regards, Alex
