On Thu, Oct 27, 2005 at 12:31:37AM -0400, James Hiscock wrote: > > Did you specify the correct device for moto4lin? Should be > /dev/ttyACM0. Also, check the permissions on /dev/ttyACM0 -- by > default, they're too restrictive.
It defaults to /dev/usb/acm/0 which seems to be correct for me. At least this file exists, whereas /dev/ttyACM0 does not. I tried it as root to make sure there were no permissions problems - it had no effect. > If you run moto4lin from a terminal, it spits out a bit of debugging > info that might help too, that looks like this: . . > <snip> > doActConnect > doActConnect > P2kProc::doConnect() > New mode: 2 > doActConnect > Filelist received: 527 > </snip> > For me it produces: Form1 PhoneMan New mode: 1 doActConnect doActConnect P2kProc::doConnect() New mode: 0 > > What do your system messages look like? > > When I first plugged in the phone, I got this: > <snip> > usb 4-2: new full speed USB device using uhci_hcd and address 2 > usb 4-2: configuration #1 chosen from 2 choices > usb.agent[24980]: Keeping default configuration with > /sys//devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:1d.3/usb4/4-2 > cdc_acm 4-2:1.0: ttyACM0: USB ACM device > usbcore: registered new driver cdc_acm > drivers/usb/class/cdc-acm.c: v0.23:USB Abstract Control Model driver > for USB modems and ISDN adapters > </snip> Looks like the main clues are the error messages produced when I plug in: usb 1-1: new full speed USB device using uhci_hcd and address 8 usb 1-1: device descriptor read/64, error -71 usb 1-1: device descriptor read/64, error -71 usb 1-1: new full speed USB device using uhci_hcd and address 9 usb 1-1: device descriptor read/64, error -71 cdc_acm 1-1:1.0: ttyACM0: USB ACM device vs your usb 4-2: new full speed USB device using uhci_hcd and address 2 usb 4-2: configuration #1 chosen from 2 choices usb.agent[24980]: Keeping default configuration with /sys//devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:1d.3/usb4/4-2 cdc_acm 4-2:1.0: ttyACM0: USB ACM device and the fact that you get a /dev/ttyACM0 and I get a /dev/usb/acm/0. I wonder if that indicates a slight USB driver change between our two kernels? I assume the two addresses I get on connect reflect the fact that my phone has two interfaces defined - one comm. with a single endpoint, and one data with 2 endpoints. Yours seems to have two configurations whereas mine has Cfg#=1 Errno 71 corresponds to "protocol error" which doesn't sound good. What does your /proc/bus/usb/devices entry show for the phone? Regards, DigbyT -- Digby R. S. Tarvin [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.digbyt.com -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
